
Critical Evaluation of Web Sites
WIT Web Lesson
Plan Assessment
WIT Web Curriculum Project Assessment
Teaching Guide
Evaluation of Module
|
|
EVALUATION OF
WEB SITES
return
to Assessment of Educational Web Sites
Introduction: The critical evaluation
of web sites is essential when using these sites to plan lessons and activities
for children's use. Seemingly unendless streams of information are
accessible to anyone with internet access. How does one determine
which sites contain information that is trustworthy, accurate, and appropriate?
As you surf the web, you will develop a keen eye for determining which
sites meet your needs. Formulating a series of questions for consideration
is helpful when evaluating web sites. It is important to take careful
notes as you discriminate among sites. Scoring the sites using
an evaluative instrument such as a rubric may be helpful.
Overview: We will discuss questions that will help us evaluate
web sites, review a checklist of these questions, evaluate web sites using
the check list, and then assign a rubric score to each web site.
NOTE: The following is taken from the Association
for Library Service to Children, a division of the American Library Association.
Their home page is located at http://www.ala.org/parentspage/greatsites/criteria.html
back to the top
Criteria
Activity 1: Discuss the following
criteria in small groups. Are there any that are mandatory for a
children's web site? Are there any additional criteria that should
be considered? Be prepared to share your findings with the whole
group.
A. Authorship/Sponsorship: Who Put up the Site?
- The name
of the individual or group creating the site should be clearly stated.
- The creator
should give a source for information in the site where necessary.
- The Web
site author or manager should provide a way for users to make comments
or ask questions.
- The Web
site author or manager should be responsive to any questions regarding
copyright, trademark, or ownership of all material on the site.
Sites that knowingly violate copyright statutes or other laws should not be linked, listed,
or recommended.
B. Purpose: Every Site Has a Reason for Being
There.
- A site's purpose should be clear and its content should reflect its purpose, be
it to entertain, persuade, educate, or sell.
- Advertising
should not overshadow the content.
- A good
site should enrich the user’s experience and expand the imagination. Sites
promoting social biases (gender, racial, religious, or other types) rather
than enlarging the views of the child should not be considered worthwhile sites.
C. Design and Stability: A Great Site Has
Personality and Strength of Character.
- The information
on the site should be easy to find and easy to use.
- The site
design should be appealing to its intended audience.
- The text
should be easy to read, and not cluttered with distracting graphics, fonts,
and backgrounds.
- Users
should be able to get around the site easily.
- Pages consisting mainly of links should be well-organized and appealing to young
people, and the collected links should be well-chosen and useful to children
exploring the subject.
- The site's
design should be appropriate for the intended audience.
- A game
or recreational site should have a clear interface and playing instructions.
- The page
should load in a reasonable amount of time.
- The page
should be consistently available and load without problems; stability
is important.
- Required "plug-ins"
or other helper applications should be clearly identified.
- The design
elements and features on the site, such as searchable databases, animations,
graphics, sound files, introductory and transitional pages, etc., should
enhance and not hinder the accessibility and enjoyment of the site.
- The interactive
features should be explained clearly.
- A user should
not need to pay a fee or type in personal information (such as his/her
name or e-mail address) before using the site.
D. Content: A Great Site Shares Meaningful and Useful
Content that Educates, Informs, or Entertains.
- The title
of a site should be appropriate to its purpose.
- A site's content
should be easy to read and understand by its intended audience.
- There
should be enough information to make visiting the site worthwhile.
- If there
are large amounts of information on the site, some kind of search function
should be provided. There should be at least an outline of topics covered, allowing
the users to find topics and move among them easily.
- Spelling
and grammar always should be correct.
- The information
should be current and accurate, and if the topic of the site is one that
changes, it should be updated regularly. A "last updated" date is
a plus.
- Links
to more information on the topic should be provided.
- Graphics
on the site should be relevant and appropriate to the content.
- The subject
matter should be relevant to and appropriate for the intended audience.
- The viewpoint
presented should be comprehensible to the intended audience.
- The skills
required to use the site’s features and structure should be appropriate
or appropriately challenging for its intended audience.
- In informational
sites, especially those used to support school assignments, quality of
content should be most important. Appealing sites for general audiences that are
accessible to young people sometimes provide the highest-quality content.
- Some sites,
such as health and life-education sites, may include mature content. Such
material should be developmentally appropriate to the information needs of youth.
E. Additional considerations:
- Is the information on the site as good as a book on the same topic?
- Is the
site grade level appropriate?
- Is the
site interactive and engaging?
back to the top
Checklist for Evaluation
The checklist is available here
Activity 2: Visit
several of the following web sites to decide which one you would like
to evaluate using the above criteria. Then download the Web
Evaluation Checklist to make written notes about the site.
back to the top
Notes:
- Every
site does not need to meet every one of these criteria to be a great site,
but the more of them a site does meet, the more likely it is to be a worthwhile
place to spend time.
- The content
on the Web changes faster than anything we have ever seen in our culture.
Therefore, in any recommended list of Web sites, the recommendations apply
only to the primary sites that are listed, not to every site linked from the primary
sites.
Warning: Some of the following sites may contain controversial
material. One of the sites is bogus - are you able to identify it?
http://www.naral.org/
- Abortion and Reproductive Rights: Choices for Women
http://www.msichicago.org/- The
Museum of Science and Industry
http://147.129.1.10/library/research/AIDSFACTS.htm
- Facts
about Aids
http://www.nra.org/ - National Rifle
Association
http://www.ala.org/parentspage/greatsites/amazing.html
- American Library Association's Great Sites for Kids
back to the top
Web Site Rubric
Activity 3: Once you have evaluated
a web site using the above criteria, you may wish to score the entire
site using a rubric such as the following 1 - 5 point scale.
- 1 - Superior
- 2 - Well done
- 3 - Helpful, functional
- 4 - Would rarely use
- 5 - Would not recommend under any circumstance
Count the number of Yes and No responses (there are a total of 38 questions).
A total of 38 Yes responses is a perfect score and would result in a rating
of 1 or superior. Form small groups and decide how you will
determine the awarding of the remainder of the rubric. Pay attention
to the mandatory questions, if any, that were identified previously.
(For example, your group may decide that sites with 35-38 Yes responses
should be awarded a "1" or "Superior;" sites with 31-34 responses should
be awarded a "2" or "Well done;" and so on. On the other hand, however,
if you have recorded a No response to a question you consider to be mandatory
for a children's site, you may score the site as a "5" or "Would not recommend
under any circumstance" regardless of the number of Yes responses.)
Plan on sharing your group's rubric with the whole group.
You may use a form such as the following to keep track of your site
evaluations, as well as to compile your homeroom's evaluations:
|
URL of site
|
Rubric Score
|
Comments
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Click here to download a copy of this form.
back to the top
Resources
Web Site Evaluations
for Children's Use
How does one teach children to discriminate among sites and the material
they offer? The following sites offer web evaluation criteria for
children to use.
Early Elementary: http://istweb.syr.edu/AWArds/Invest.pdf
Elementary :
http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/evalelem.html
Middle School: http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/evalmidd.html
Secondary School: http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/evalhigh.html
World Wide Web Evaluation Form: http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/tutorial/WWW.eval.html
back to the top
Internet Safety for Children's
Use
Using the Internet Safely: http://www.yahooligans.com/docs/safety/index.html
Kids Privacy Law:
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/kidzprivacy/kidz.ht
Keeping Children Safe
As They Surf
FBI site - A Parent Guide to Internet Safety : http://www.fbi.gov/library/pguide/pguidee.htm
PC Magazine's safety tips (includes detailed evaluations of popular
children's search engines) http://familypc.zdnet.com/safety/index.html
Cybersafe Kids: http://www.ncpc.org/netsafe.htm
The Children's Partnership (includes a guide to When Is Your Child Ready?
for computer and internet use) http://www.childrenspartnership.org/pub/pbpg98/partI98.html
Whose Internet Connection Is It Anyway? http://www.redrival.com/netschoolbus/index2.html
Kids Privacy Law on the Internet: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/kidzprivacy/adults.htm
back to the top
Additional web evaluation sites:
Submit a form to Cathy
Schrock's web page evaluation (This site offers an interactive,
online critical evaluation survey and database)
Submit a quality web site to the American Library Association at
http://www.ala.org/alsc/nwsccrit.html
http://www.iss.stthomas.edu/webtruth/evaluate.htm
http://www.learningspace.org/prof_growth/assessment.html
http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/ho.html
(world wide web evaluation form)
http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/eval.html
http://www2.widener.edu/Wolfgram-Memorial-Library/webeval.htm
http://faculty.acu.edu/~armstrongl/geography/webeval.htm
back to the top
Bibliography
http://www.ala.org
http://www.iss.stthomas.edu/webtruth/evaluate.htm
http://www.learningspace.org/prof_growth/assessment.html
http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/ho.html(world
wide web evaluation form)
http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/eval.html
http://faculty.acu.edu/~armstrongl/geography/webeval.htm
http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/tutorial/WWW.eval.html
back to the top
|
|